Wednesday, 20 May 2015

Changes to Homecare in Ontario

It is no secret that many are frustrated with government funded home care services citing issues with waiting lists, limited hours and service provision. So much so that there was a government-commissioned report on the subject that was released in the early part of 2015. At long last our province is attempting to assist with these issues and has announced some interesting changes that they are piloting. This is interesting news for elderly or almost elderly Ontarians and I for one, will be anxious to see the results. In a nutshell they are planning on infusing money into the system ($750 million over 3 years) and allowing 'self-directed funding' for home care provision. The theory is that people can then use their allotment to hire the care they most need and the care providers they want to work with.

In theory, this seems like a plan that might alleviate wait lists and allow for better service to recipients but until its properly tested, the glitches will not be known. I wonder how many new home care agencies will pop up with the promise of new business, and how many good agencies will be challenged by the loss of home care contracts. I also wonder if its an attempt for the government to 'wash their hands' of the problems by taking away their responsibility to fix what is broken and simply give responsibility for it to overtaxed families or seniors who may not have the wherewithal to organize their own care properly or be easily subjected to financial abuse.

There is promise of a model of 'bundled care' for those discharged from hospital so there is continuity between hospital and home, but one wonders how well orchestrated that will be and if staffing and funding to hospitals will be increased in a direct way to accommodate this change properly.

Will the money they are putting into this plan be enough to sustain people who are on a limited income and require assistance at home? What will happen if they use up their funding and still need care but can't afford to pay for it? Will it decrease the pressure on the long-term care system or make it worse?

By no means do I want to be critical before such a plan has gotten off the ground. I think its a good thing that money is being infused into the system earmarked for home care. And I think its good that they recognize that the system we have now is broken and not sustainable. They are clearly finding ways to think 'outside the box'. But I also worry that this system will only work for a few rather than the majority and that it's only a small piece of the puzzle. We still need our government to look at funding more than simply long-term care and, at innovative ways to care for our ageing population beyond what currently exists.

I suppose everything takes time. We will simply have to wait and see what the pilot projects report back and hope that the kinks are ironed out well before it is rolled out in a big way.

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

The Meaning of Life

Last week I saw an interesting news clip. It was about a lady in her 80's who volunteers in a children's cancer ward and gives out toys to young patients. She buys the toys with her own money and truly enjoys watching their joy as she hands them something that takes their mind off their treatment. She does this because years ago, she too had a sick child with cancer and from that experience understands the importance of helping a child and their parents, through a difficult illness.
I've been thinking about this since seeing this clip because lately, I've heard of other stories with a similar theme.

Parents in Ontario who lost a child to cancer a few months ago have set up swabbing events all across the province and beyond, to help match healthy donors with those in need of stem cell transplants.

This past Sunday we sadly heard about the death of Barbara Turnbull, a woman who made the news 32 years ago when she was shot during a burglary and became a paraplegic. She went on to become a very well respected journalist, and by all accounts, did not allow her situation to 'handicap' the person she was and wanted to be.

The legacy of a young boy, a young girl, a young woman and their families........is something they all have in common. They did not allow their own tragedy to define them. They were all dealt a horrible hand in life but have taken what they have had no choice but to accept and turned it into something positive - something that will help others to perhaps not go through what they did and ease the pain of those who do.  

Sometimes small gestures can turn into something big. Sometimes giving someone hope or comfort or companionship makes a difference beyond anything one can imagine or expect. Everyone has their burdens to bear but what matters is how we deal with the cards in our deck. I think most people want to live a life of meaning - not everyone knows how - some people are fortunate to be able to choose; others have it chosen for them. Perhaps its not about how much time we have on this earth but what we do with that time and how we impact and touch others that is the true meaning of life.

I am reminded of a poem I read years ago called The Dash (written by Linda Ellis) http://www.linda-ellis.com/the-dash-the-dash-poem-by-linda-ellis-.html. It basically refers to 'the dash' on a tombstone between the date of birth and date of death. The dash is our legacy; the memories we leave behind in others....

" ...For that dash represents all the time
That she spent alive on earth....
And now only those who loved her
Know what that little line is worth.
For it matters not how much we own;
The cars...the house...the cash.
What matters is how we live and love
And how we spend our dash....."